ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
A brain tumor computer-aided diagnosis method with automatic lesion segmentation and ensemble decision strategy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics-based artificial intelligence models in brain tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.Neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of Radiomics in Gliomas: Insights into Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Research Trends.Cancers · 2025Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence with UNet based segmentation and Bayesian machine learning for classification of brain tumors using MRI images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MRI radiomics-based interpretable model and nomogram for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression status in primary central nervous system lymphoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Gliomas and brain metastases (Mets) are the most common brain malignancies. The treatment strategy and clinical prognosis of patients are different, requiring accurate diagnosis of tumor types. However, the traditional radiomics diagnostic pipeline requires manual annotation and lacks integrated methods for segmentation and classification. To improve the diagnosis process, a gliomas and Mets computer-aided diagnosis method with automatic lesion segmentation and ensemble decision strategy on multi-center datasets was proposed. Methods: Overall, 1,022 high-grade gliomas and 775 Mets patients' preoperative MR images were adopted in the study, including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1-CE) and T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (T2-flair) sequences from three hospitals. Two segmentation models trained on the gliomas and Mets datasets, respectively, were used to automatically segment tumors. Multiple radiomics features were extracted after automatic segmentation. Several machine learning classifiers were used to measure the impact of feature selection methods. A weight soft voting (RSV) model and ensemble decision strategy based on prior knowledge (EDPK) were introduced in the radiomics pipeline. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the classification performance. Results: The proposed pipeline improved the diagnosis of gliomas and Mets with ACC reaching 0.8950 and AUC reaching 0.9585 after automatic lesion segmentation, which was higher than those of the traditional radiomics pipeline (ACC:0.8850, AUC:0.9450). Conclusion: The proposed model accurately classified gliomas and Mets patients using MRI radiomics. The novel pipeline showed great potential in diagnosing gliomas and Mets with high generalizability and interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.