ArticleData in brief2023
Psychometric and next day electrodermal activity data from an experiment involving midazolam, ketamine, and painful stimulation.
Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is a report of unpublished data obtained from a randomized, single-blind, within-subject crossover design, neuroimaging trial comparing the effects of midazolam and ketamine on memory and pain. An experimental auditory paradigm paired with the periodic pain was used to examine auditory encoding and subsequent recognition. Psychometric surveys assessed stress, anxiety, depression, and pain behaviors. These data were collected to potentially characterize inter-subject variation during analysis. Electrodermal activity was measured to examine the association between previous pain-pairing of experimental items and autonomic responses during next day recognition memory testing, with exposure to the same auditory word items. Electrodermal responses were determined using an event-related analysis approach. These data may help shape future experiments using psychometric data to characterize individual responses or using next day electrodermal activity to determine conditioned responses to previously-experienced aversive stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.