ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
A retrospective audit of young adults who received permanent pacemakers at a teaching hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While most pacemaker implantations occur in older individuals, younger patients also receive pacemakers. In these, degenerative conduction system disease is less likely to be the cause of atrioventricular block (AVB), with other diseases being more common. There is, however, a paucity of data on this group as well as on younger pacemaker recipients that have undergone pacemaker implantation for reasons other than AVB. The aim of this study was to perform an audit of young adult permanent pacemaker recipients. Method: This was a retrospective record review, conducted in the Division of Cardiology at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. We included 169 adult patients between the ages of 18 and 60, who received permanent pacemakers between 2010 and 2020. A subgroup analysis of patients 55 years and younger was also performed. Results: Third degree AVB was the most common indication for pacemaker implantation ( Conclusion: Given that the mean age of our study population was high, the low number of identified underlying causes in the whole cohort (≤60 years) may reflect some AVB due to age related degeneration of the conductions system in the patients 56 to 60 years age, but also raises the possibility that these patients may be less likely to be extensively investigated for an underlying cause than those ≤55 years, where diseases such as sarcoidosis were more readily confirmed. As access to advanced diagnostic tools improves, the percentage of young pacemaker recipients with an underlying cause identified may increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.