ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
CRISPR deletion of a SINE-VNTR-
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-read sequencing maps transposable element variation and its regulatory and epigenetic effects in the human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Characterisation of the function of a lncRNA containing SINE-VNTR-Alu 67 to regulate the genes at theExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Mini-heterochromatin domains constrain the cis-regulatory impact of SVA transposons in human brain development and disease.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024Article
- Deciphering the role of a SINE-VNTR-Alu retrotransposon polymorphism as a biomarker of Parkinson's disease progression.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring SVA Insertion Polymorphisms in Shaping Differential Gene Expressions in the Central Nervous System.Biomolecules · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: SINE-VNTR- Methods: We performed CRISPR to delete SVA_67 in the HEK293 cell line. Quantification of target gene expression was performed using qPCR to assess the effects on expression in response to the deletion of SVA_67. Differences between CRISPR edit and control cell lines were analysed using two-tailed t-test with a minimum 95% confidence interval to determine statistical significance. Results: In this study, we provide data highlighting the SVA-specific effect on differential gene expression. We demonstrate that the hemizygous deletion of the endogenous SVA_67 in CRISPR edited cell lines was associated with differential expression of several genes at the Discussion: This data is consistent with our previous bioinformatic work of differential gene expression analysis using transcriptomic data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort. As SVAs have regulatory influences on gene expression, and insertion polymorphisms contribute to interpersonal differences in expression patterns, these results highlight the potential contribution of these elements to complex diseases with potentially many genetic components, such as PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.