Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37840899›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023

A Systematic Review of Screw and Suture Button Glenoid Augmentation Constructs.

John N Manfredi, Samuel Schick, Kyle D Paul, Joseph W Elphingstone, Josiah Sowell, Megan Lameka, Eugene W Brabston, Amit M Momaya, Brent A Ponce

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparable 1-year results after arthroscopic Latarjet using screw or suture-button fixation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John N ManfrediDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Samuel SchickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Kyle D PaulUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Joseph W ElphingstoneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Josiah SowellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Megan LamekaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Eugene W BrabstonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Amit M MomayaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Brent A PonceHughston Clinic, Columbus, Georgia, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USHughston Clinic · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glenohumeral dislocations often lead to glenoid bone loss and recurrent instability, warranting bony augmentation. While numerous biomechanical studies have investigated fixation methods to secure a graft to the glenoid, a review of available constructs has yet to be performed. Purpose: To synthesize the literature and compare the biomechanics of screw and suture button constructs for anterior glenoid bony augmentation. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. There were 2 independent reviewers who performed a literature search using the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases of studies published between 1950 and 2020. Studies were included that compared the biomechanical outcomes of fixation for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Results: Overall, 13 of the 363 studies screened met the inclusion criteria. The included studies measured the biomechanical strength of screws or suture buttons on a cadaveric or synthetic Latarjet construct. Screws and suture buttons were biomechanically similar, as both constructs exhibited comparable loads at failure and final displacement. Screw type (diameter, threading, or composition) did not significantly affect construct strength, and double-screw fixation was superior to single-screw fixation. Additionally, 2 screws augmented with a small plate had a higher load at failure than screws that were not augmented. Unicortical double-screw fixation was inferior to bicortical double-screw fixation, although construct strength did not significantly decrease if 1 of these screws was unicortical. Further, 2 screws inserted at 15° off axis experienced significantly higher graft displacement and lower ultimate failure loads than those inserted at 0° parallel to the glenoid. Conclusion: Suture buttons provided comparable strength to screws and offer an effective alternative to reduce screw-related complications. Augmentation with a small plate may clinically enhance construct strength and decrease complications through the dispersion of force loads over a greater surface area. Differences in screw type did not appear to alter construct strength, provided that screws were placed parallel to the articular surface and were bicortical.

Indexed as

biomechanicalbone graftfixationglenoidshoulder instabilitysuture button

Identifiers

PMID37840899
PMCPMC10571685
OpenAlexW4387577903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.