ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Impact of GAN artifacts for simulating mammograms on identifying mammographically occult cancer.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Synthetic Data and Generative AI in Breast Imaging: Promise, Pitfalls, and Pathways Forward.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep-learning-based image reconstruction with limited data: generating synthetic raw data using deep learning.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Report on the AAPM Grand Challenge on deep generative modeling for learning medical image statistics.ArXiv · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can synthesize various feasible-looking images. We showed that a GAN, specifically a conditional GAN (CGAN), can simulate breast mammograms with normal, healthy appearances and can help detect mammographically-occult (MO) cancer. However, similar to other GANs, CGANs can suffer from various artifacts, e.g., checkerboard artifacts, that may impact the quality of the final synthesized image, as well as the performance of detecting MO cancer. We explored the types of GAN artifacts that exist in mammogram simulations and their effect on MO cancer detection. Approach: We first trained a CGAN using digital mammograms (FFDMs) of 1366 women with normal/healthy breasts. Then, we tested the trained CGAN on an independent MO cancer dataset with 333 women with dense breasts (97 MO cancers). We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) on the MO cancer dataset, in which real and simulated mammograms were fused, to identify women with MO cancer. Then, a radiologist who was independent of the development of the CGAN algorithms evaluated the entire MO cancer dataset to identify and annotate artifacts in the simulated mammograms. Results: We found four artifact types, including checkerboard, breast boundary, nipple-areola complex, and black spots around calcification artifacts, with an overall incidence rate over 69% (the individual incident rate ranged from 9% to 53%) from both normal and MO cancer samples. We then evaluated their potential impact on MO cancer detection. Even though various artifacts existed in the simulated mammogram, we found that it still provided complementary information for MO cancer detection when it was combined with the real mammograms. Conclusions: We found that artifacts were pervasive in the CGAN-simulated mammograms. However, they did not negatively affect our MO cancer detection algorithm; the simulated mammograms still provided complementary information for MO cancer detection when combined with real mammograms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.