Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37840685›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2023

Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: a narrative review.

Hassan Mumtaz, Muhammad Hamza Riaz, Hanan Wajid, Muhammad Saqib, Muhammad Hamayl Zeeshan, Shaheer Ellahi Khan, Yesha Rajendrabhai Chauhan, Hassan Sohail, Laiba Iman Vohra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Evaluating a digital tool for supporting people affected by breast cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial-the ADAPT study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hassan MumtazDepartment of Public Health, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hamza RiazDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hanan WajidDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shalamar Medical & Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad SaqibDepartment of Internal Medicine, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hamayl ZeeshanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shaheer Ellahi KhanDepartment of Public Health, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yesha Rajendrabhai ChauhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baroda Medical College, Gujrat, India.
Hassan SohailDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Laiba Iman VohraDepartment of Medicine, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health is a field that aims to improve patient care through the use of technology, such as telemedicine, mobile health, electronic health records, and artificial intelligence. The aim of this review is to examine the challenges and potential solutions for the implementation and evaluation of digital health technologies. Digital tools are used across the world in different settings. In Australia, the Digital Health Translation and Implementation Program (DHTI) emphasizes the importance of involving stakeholders and addressing infrastructure and training issues for healthcare workers. The WHO's Global Task Force on Digital Health for TB aims to address tuberculosis through digital health innovations. Digital tools are also used in mental health care, but their effectiveness must be evaluated during development. Oncology supportive care uses digital tools for cancer patient intervention and surveillance, but evaluating their effectiveness can be challenging. In the COVID and post-COVID era, digital health solutions must be evaluated based on their technological maturity and size of deployment, as well as the quality of data they provide. To safely and effectively use digital healthcare technology, it is essential to prioritize evaluation using complex systems and evidence-based medical frameworks. To address the challenges of digital health implementation, it is important to prioritize ethical research addressing issues of user consent and addressing socioeconomic disparities in access and effectiveness. It is also important to consider the impact of digital health on health outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of service delivery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehumanspandemicsprivacysocioeconomic disparities in healthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37840685
PMCPMC10568450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.