Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37840661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Comparison of osteogenic capability of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds and granules with different porosities for clinical translation.

Xusong Yue, Liben Zhao, Jun Yang, Xiaoyi Jiao, Fanghui Wu, Yan Zhang, Yifan Li, Jiandi Qiu, Xiurong Ke, Xiaoliang Sun and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xusong Yue *Department of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Liben Zhao *Department of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jun Yang *Department of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiaoyi JiaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Fanghui WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yan ZhangBio-Nanomaterials and Regenerative Medicine Research Division, Zhejiang-California International Nanosystem Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yifan LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiandi QiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiurong KeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiaoliang SunDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xianyan YangBio-Nanomaterials and Regenerative Medicine Research Division, Zhejiang-California International Nanosystem Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhongru GouBio-Nanomaterials and Regenerative Medicine Research Division, Zhejiang-California International Nanosystem Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Guojing YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rui'an People's Hospital, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pore parameters, structural stability, and filler morphology of artificial implants are key factors influencing the process of bone tissue repair. However, the extent to which each of these factors contributes to bone formation in the preparation of porous bioceramics is currently unclear, with the two often being coupled. Herein, we prepared magnesium-doped wollastonite (Mg-CSi) scaffolds with 57% and 70% porosity (57-S and 70-S) via a 3D printing technique. Meanwhile, the bioceramic granules (57-G and 70-G) with curved pore topography (IWP) were prepared by physically disrupting the 57-S and 70-S scaffolds, respectively, and compared for

Indexed as

3D printingosteogenic capabilityporosityporous granulesporous scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID37840661
PMCPMC10569306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.