Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37840556›Full record

ArticleUCL open. Environment2023

Communicating climate change and biodiversity loss with local populations: exploring communicative utopias in eight transdisciplinary case studies.

Dawud Ansari, Regine Schönenberg, Melissa Abud, Laura Becerra, Wassim Brahim, Javier Castiblanco, Anne Cristina de la Vega-Leinert, Nigel Dudley, Michael Dunlop, Carolina Figueroa and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in UCL open. Environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Dawud AnsariEnergy Access and Development Program (EADP), Wilmersdorfer Str. 122-123, 10627, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5621-8357
Regine SchönenbergFree University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Melissa AbudWWF Colombia, Carrera 35 No. 4A-25 Cali, Colombia.
Laura BecerraThe Luc Hoffmann Institute, Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
Wassim BrahimEnergy Access and Development Program (EADP), Wilmersdorfer Str. 122-123, 10627, Berlin, Germany.
Javier CastiblancoWWF Colombia, Carrera 35 No. 4A-25 Cali, Colombia.
Anne Cristina de la Vega-LeinertInstitute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Str. 16, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Nigel DudleyEquilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Spike Island, Bristol, UK.
Michael DunlopCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Building 101, Clunies Ross St, Black Mountain ACT 2601, Australia.
Carolina FigueroaThe Luc Hoffmann Institute, Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
Oscar GuevaraWWF Colombia, Carrera 35 No. 4A-25 Cali, Colombia.
Philipp HauserTechnische Universität Dresden, Chair of Energy Economicy, Münchnerplatz 3, 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2771-3732
Hannes HobbieTechnische Universität Dresden, Chair of Energy Economicy, Münchnerplatz 3, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Mostafa A R HossainDepartment of Fish Biology and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.
Jean HugéOpen University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Luc Janssens de BisthovenCEBioS, 'Capacities for Biodiversity and Sustainable Development', Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Hilde KeunenCEBioS, 'Capacities for Biodiversity and Sustainable Development', Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Claudia Munera-RoldanFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Jan PetzoldDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Luisenstr. 37, 80333 München, Germany.
Anne-Julie RochetteCEBioS, 'Capacities for Biodiversity and Sustainable Development', Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Matthew SchmidtTechnische Universität Dresden, Chair of Energy Economicy, Münchnerplatz 3, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Charlotte SchumannFree University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sayanti SenguptaRed Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, Anna van Saksenlaan 50, 2593 HT Den Haag, Netherlands.
Susanne Stoll-KleemannInstitute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Str. 16, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Lorrae van KerkhoffFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Maarten P M VanhoveHasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Zoology: Biodiversity and Toxicology, Agoralaan gebouw D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Carina WybornThe Luc Hoffmann Institute, Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and biodiversity loss trigger policies targeting and impacting local communities worldwide. However, research and policy implementation often fail to sufficiently consider community responses and to involve them. We present the results of a collective self-assessment exercise for eight case studies of communications with regard to climate change or biodiversity loss between project teams and local communities. We develop eight indicators of good stakeholder communication, reflecting the scope of Verran's (2002) concept of postcolonial moments as a communicative utopia. We demonstrate that applying our indicators can enhance communication and enable community responses. However, we discover a divergence between timing, complexity and (introspective) effort. Three cases qualify for postcolonial moments, but scrutinising power relations and genuine knowledge co-production remain rare. While we verify the potency of various instruments for deconstructing science, their sophistication cannot substitute trust building and epistemic/transdisciplinary awareness. Lastly, we consider that reforming inadequate funding policies helps improving the work in and with local communities.

Indexed as

biodiversity lossclimate changeknowledge co-productionlocal communitieslocal knowledgepostcolonial momentstransdisciplinary communication

Identifiers

PMID37840556
PMCPMC10571513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.