ArticleImmunologic research2024
Current genetic defects in common variable immunodeficiency patients on the geography between Europe and Asia: a single-center experience.
Article in Immunologic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does CVID exist in children? A genetic architecture and manifestation map derived from 7,525 patients.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Unclassified Inborn Errors of Immunity Patients without any Pathogenic Variant in Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing: Long-Term Follow-up and Whole Exome Sequencing Results.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- A systematic literature review of CVID reveals pervasive detrimental noninfectious manifestations.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Familial patterns of immune dysregulation in CVID: insights from B- and T-cell phenotyping and antibody profiling.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Genetics in a Danish Common Variable Immunodeficiency Cohort.Journal of clinical immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of the causes of monogenetic common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients has rapidly increased in the last years by means of worldwide availability of appropriate genetic diagnostic methods. However, up to date, very limited numbers of reports demonstrating the role of geography, ethnicity, and consanguinity have been published. Here, we reported the first study of Turkish CVID patients and compared them with the results of three countries from America, Europe, and Asia. A total of 100 children diagnosed as CVID according to the criteria of European Society for Immunodeficiencies were enrolled, and they were genetically analyzed by using targeted next-generation sequencing and whole-exome sequencing. The median age of our patients was 5.8 years (range, 3.0-16.0 years) at clinical diagnosis and 9.0 years (range, 4.8-21.0 years) at the time of genetic diagnosis. The consanguinity rate was 24%. Disease-causing pathogenic variants were defined in 40% of patients in a total of 17 different genes. Sixteen of 40 identified pathogenic variants were novel (40%). We determined 18 surface molecular defects, 10 cytosolic defects, 9 nuclear defects, and 3 others. In our cohort, the most common gene was TACI (15/40 in pathogenic variant identified cases and 15/100 in all cases) followed by the others such as PLCү2, LRBA, TCF3, and STAT1. In contrast to our expectations, our results were more similar to American and European population rather than Asians, although we also have high consanguinity rates and live on the geography between Europe and Asia. Genetic investigation is a great challenge, because of the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease, and each country has to know their own current genetic landscape in CVID for a better and successful management of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.