ArticleScientific reports2023
Design and fabrication of 3D-printed patient-specific soft tissue and bone phantoms for CT imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a novel three-dimensional patient-specific pediatric brain phantom for computed tomography neuroimaging research.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Obese patient imaging: Potential dose reduction with photon-counting CT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Dual-Filament 3D Printing of Patient-Specific CT Phantoms with Embedded Implants and Tunable Metal-Artifact Intensity.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a CZT-based photon-counting detector CT prototype for low-dose lung cancer screening using patient-specific lung phantoms.Research square · 2026Article
- In-house development of CT-based 3D-printed head & neck phantom for Radiotherapy applications.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- An in-house fabricated patient-specific pediatric head CT phantom for trauma-oriented emergency imaging: two-scanner validation and expert reader assessment.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Processing and Modeling of Alginate Hydrogel for Radiologically-Equivalent Biomedical Phantoms.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bone Organoids: A Novel Tool for Modeling and Managing Skeletal Disorders in Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Mimicking Tissues in 3D-Printed Radiology Phantoms: Brand, Product, and Color of Printing Filaments Matter!Polymers · 2026Article
- X-Ray Attenuation Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Materials for Mimicking Tissues in Radiographic Phantoms Measured by CT from 70 to 140 kV: 2025 Update.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Establishing a Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit: Teamwork Triumphs!!!Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- An Enhanced Voxel-by-Voxel Filament Extrusion-Based Method for Realistic Radiological Phantoms: A Breast Phantom Case.Polymers · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a CZT-based photon-counting detector CT prototype for low-dose lung cancer screening using patient-specific lung phantoms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Obese patient imaging: improved dose efficiency with photon-counting CT.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Validation of a novel 3D-printed anthropomorphic pediatric abdomen phantom using photon-counting CT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Phantoms in X-Ray-Based Radiotherapy Research: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimization and fabrication of a novel 3D-printed variable density range modulation device for proton FLASH beams.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A novel method to simulate radiographs of 3D printed objects.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Physics-informed model-based generative neural network for synthesizing scanner- and algorithm-specific low-dose CT exams.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study is to create patient-specific phantoms for computed tomography (CT) that possess accurate densities and exhibit visually realistic image textures. These qualities are crucial for evaluating CT performance in clinical settings. The study builds upon a previously presented 3D printing method (PixelPrint) by incorporating soft tissue and bone structures. We converted patient DICOM images directly into 3D printer instructions using PixelPrint and utilized calcium-doped filament to increase the Hounsfield unit (HU) range. Density was modeled by controlling printing speed according to volumetric filament ratio to emulate attenuation profiles. We designed micro-CT phantoms to demonstrate the reproducibility, and to determine mapping between filament ratios and HU values on clinical CT systems. Patient phantoms based on clinical cervical spine and knee examinations were manufactured and scanned with a clinical spectral CT scanner. The CT images of the patient-based phantom closely resembled original CT images in visual texture and contrast. Micro-CT analysis revealed minimal variations between prints, with an overall deviation of ± 0.8% in filament line spacing and ± 0.022 mm in line width. Measured differences between patient and phantom were less than 12 HU for soft tissue and 15 HU for bone marrow, and 514 HU for cortical bone. The calcium-doped filament accurately represented bony tissue structures across different X-ray energies in spectral CT (RMSE ranging from ± 3 to ± 28 HU, compared to 400 mg/ml hydroxyapatite). In conclusion, this study demonstrated the possibility of extending 3D-printed patient-based phantoms to soft tissue and bone structures while maintaining accurate organ geometry, image texture, and attenuation profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.