Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37840005›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

Activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Su Young Lee, Christian M Gill, David P Nicolau, ERACE-PA Global Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. New resistance threat in difficult-to-treat resistanceEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CombattingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Türkiye.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Resistance mechanisms and therapeutic strategies forTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Su Young LeeSchool of Pharmacy, West Coast University, 590 N. Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90004, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1088-444X
Christian M GillCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3606-0761
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4148-0165
ERACE-PA Global Study Group
Hartford Hospital · USWest Coast University · US

Funding

Center for Anti-Infective Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is complex and multifaceted. While the novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam inhibit serine-based β-lactamases, the comparative potency of the novel β-lactam (BL)/BLI combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa is unknown.

objectivesTo compare the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftazidime, imipenem/relebactam, imipenem, meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against serine β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.

methodsCarbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were collated through the Enhancing Rational Antimicrobials against Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (ERACE-PA) Global Surveillance. Isolates positive for serine-based carbapenemases were assessed. MICs were determined by broth microdilution to each novel BL/BLI and BL alone.

resultsGES was the most common carbapenemase identified (n = 59) followed by KPC (n = 8). Ceftazidime/avibactam had MIC50/MIC90 values of 4/8 mg/L and 91% of isolates were susceptible. Conversely, ceftazidime alone was active against only 3% of isolates. The MIC50/MIC90 of imipenem/relebactam were 16/>16 mg/L and 13% of all isolates were defined as susceptible. Of the KPC-producing isolates, 38% were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam, compared with 0% to imipenem. The meropenem/vaborbactam MIC50/MIC90 were >16/>16 mg/L, and 6% of isolates were susceptible, which was similar to meropenem alone (MIC50/90, >8/>8 mg/L; 3% susceptible) suggesting the addition of vaborbactam cannot overcome co-expressed, non-enzymatic resistance mechanisms.

conclusionsAmong the novel BL/BLIs, ceftazidime/avibactam displayed better in vitro activity and thus is a rational treatment option for serine carbapenemase-harbouring P. aeruginosa. While imipenem/relebactam displayed some activity, particularly against isolates with blaKPC, meropenem/vaborbactam exhibited poor activity, with MICs similar to meropenem alone.

Indexed as

CarbapenemsCeftazidimeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesBoronic AcidsDrug CombinationsImipenemLactamsMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsavibactamAzabicyclo CompoundsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesBoronic AcidscarbapenemaseCarbapenemsCeftazidimeDrug CombinationsImipenemLactamsMeropenemrelebactamvaborbactam

Identifiers

PMID37840005
PMCPMC10689909
OpenAlexW4387651563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.