ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
A multicenter retrospective electronic health record database evaluation of subjects with Mycoplasma genitalium.
Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) increasing in prevalence. The recent availability of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) has led to updated diagnostic and treatment guidelines. As medication therapy experts, pharmacists can facilitate appropriate antimicrobial selection and stewardship and optimize best patient-care practices in the setting of M. genitalium infection.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate patient demographics, therapeutic approaches, and complications of patients with laboratory evidence of M. genitalium hypothesizing that younger adolescent females are affected by this organism, receive suboptimal treatment, and have more complications than adults.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX multicenter electronic health record data of subjects aged 12 years and older with evidence of M. genitalium DNA detected via NAATs. The cohort was divided into 2 age groups: adolescents (12-21 years) and adults (older than 21 years). We evaluated age, sex, race, ethnicity, diagnostic codes, and medication codes.
resultsOur study included 1126 subjects (192 adolescents [17.1%] and 934 adults [82.9%]) who tested positive for M. genitalium. Subjects in the adolescent group had higher odds of being women (2.52 [1.80, 3.54], P < 0.001), having inflammatory diseases of female pelvic organs diagnostic codes (1.51 [1.06, 2.16], P = 0.025), increased odds of azithromycin prescription (1.70 [1.17, 2.48], P = 0.005), and decreased odds of moxifloxacin prescription (0.41 [0.26, 0.64], P < 0.001).
conclusionsOur study revealed a higher prevalence of M. genitalium infection in adults and adolescents with increased odds of receiving azithromycin and decreased odds of receiving moxifloxacin. Both age groups had decreased odds of receiving doxycycline compared with azithromycin despite guidelines recommending initial empirical antibiotic treatment with doxycycline and growing macrolide resistance. Suboptimal treatment of this infection may lead to lifelong complications. Pharmacists may provide crucial guidance and education to both patients and health care providers regarding appropriate treatment for M. genitalium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.