ArticleBone2024
Cells transiently expressing periostin are required for intramedullary intramembranous bone regeneration.
Article in Bone, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clearing-enabled light sheet microscopy as a novel method for three-dimensional mapping of the sensory innervation of the mouse knee.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Clearing-enabled light sheet microscopy as a novel method for three-dimensional mapping of the sensory innervation of the mouse knee.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Research progress of periostin and osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Intramembranous bone regeneration plays an important role in fixation of intramedullary implants used in joint replacement and dental implants used in tooth replacement. Despite widespread recognition of the importance of intramembranous bone regeneration in these clinical procedures, the underlying mechanisms have not been well explored. A previous study that examined transcriptomic profiles of regenerating bone from the marrow space showed that increased periostin gene expression preceded increases in several osteogenic genes. We therefore sought to determine the role of cells transiently expressing periostin in intramedullary intramembranous bone regeneration. We used a genetic mouse model that allows tamoxifen-inducible fluorescent labeling of periostin expressing cells. These mice underwent ablation of the bone marrow cavity through surgical disruption, a well-established intramembranous bone regeneration model. We found that in intact bones, fluorescently labeled cells were largely restricted to the periosteal surface of cortical bone and were absent in bone marrow. However, following surgical disruption of the bone marrow cavity, cells transiently expressing periostin were found within the regenerating tissue of the bone marrow compartment even though the cortical bone remained intact. The source of these cells is likely heterogenous, including cells occupying the periosteal surface as well as pericytes and endothelial cells within the marrow cavity. We also found that diphtheria toxin-mediated depletion of cells transiently expressing periostin at the time of surgery impaired intramembranous bone regeneration in mice. These data suggest a critical role of periostin expressing cells in intramedullary intramembranous bone regeneration and may lead to novel therapeutic interventions to accelerate or enhance implant fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.