Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37839441›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Energetic costs of feeding in 12 species of small-bodied primates.

Christine E Wall, Jandy B Hanna, Matthew C O'Neill, Maxx Toler, Myra F Laird

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Energetic costs of feeding in 12 species of small-bodied primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Introduction: food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christine E WallDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8050-1590
Jandy B HannaDuke Lemur Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Matthew C O'NeillDepartment of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85012, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9614-7813
Maxx TolerJerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27506, USA.
Myra F LairdDepartment of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-0407
Duke University · USCampbell University · USMidwestern University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no comparative, empirical studies of the energetic costs of feeding in mammals. As a result, we lack physiological data to better understand the selection pressures on the mammalian feeding apparatus and the influence of variables such as food geometric and material properties. This study investigates interspecific scaling of the net energetic costs of feeding in relation to body size, jaw-adductor muscle mass and food properties in a sample of 12 non-human primate species ranging in size from 0.08 to 4.2 kg. Net energetic costs during feeding were measured by indirect calorimetry for a variety of pre-cut and whole raw foods varying in geometric and material properties. Net feeding costs were determined in two ways: by subtracting either the initial metabolic rate prior to feeding or subtracting the postprandial metabolic rate. Interspecific scaling relationships were evaluated using pGLS and OLS regression. Net feeding costs scale negatively relative to both body mass and jaw-adductor mass. Large animals incur relatively lower feeding costs indicating that small and large animals experience and solve mechanical challenges in relation to energetics in different ways. This article is part of the theme issue 'Food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals'.

Indexed as

MammalsPrimatesAnimalsBody SizeFeeding BehaviorMuscle, Skeletalallometric scalingbiomechanicsjaw adductornutrition

Identifiers

PMID37839441
PMCPMC10577031
OpenAlexW4387652702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.