ReviewBiophysical journal2024
DNA origami: Interrogating the nano-landscape of immune receptor activation.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Materials and measurement in mechanobiology.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Multivalent DNA Origami Enables Single-Molecule Dissection of Integrin αvβ6-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Crosstalk in Cancer Biology.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Advancements in DNA-Driven Precision Modulation of Cell Surface Receptor for Programmable Cellular Functions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Clustering of Membrane Receptors: Insights from DNA Origami-Based Approaches.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Biophysics of immune cell signaling.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Advancements in Aptamer-Driven DNA Nanostructures for Precision Drug Delivery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Design and Characterization of a Gene-Encoding DNA Nanoparticle in a Cell-Free Transcription-Translation System.ACS applied nano materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The immune response is orchestrated by elaborate protein interaction networks that interweave ligand-mediated receptor reorganization with signaling cascades. While the biochemical processes have been extensively investigated, delineating the biophysical principles governing immune receptor activation has remained challenging due to design limitations of traditional ligand display platforms. These constraints have been overcome by advances in DNA origami nanotechnology, enabling unprecedented control over ligand geometry on configurable scaffolds. It is now possible to systematically dissect the independent roles of ligand stoichiometry, spatial distribution, and rigidity in immune receptor activation, signaling, and cooperativity. In this review, we highlight pioneering efforts in manipulating the ligand presentation landscape to understand immune receptor triggering and to engineer functional immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.