Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37838807›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024

Discordance in exclusive breastfeeding between maternal recall and deuterium dose-to-mother technique during the first 6 months of infants: A multi-country study in Asia.

Pattanee Winichagoon, Tippawan Pongcharoen, Tetra Fadjarwati, Ermin Winarno, Norima A Karim, Enkhzul Purevsuren, Tanvir Ahmad, Ayesha Yameen, Manjula Hettiarachchi, Kunchit Judprasong and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pattanee WinichagoonFood and Nutrition Acedemic and Research Cluster, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. pattanee.win@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-6919
Tippawan PongcharoenFood and Nutrition Acedemic and Research Cluster, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1056-4961
Tetra FadjarwatiCentre for Health Services Policy, Health Policy Agency, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ermin WinarnoResearch Center for Radiation Process Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-7920-5911
Norima A KarimNutrition Science, School of Healthcare Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Enkhzul PurevsurenNational Center for Maternal and Child Health (NCMCH), Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Tanvir AhmadPakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, Isalambad, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0005-2956-4859
Ayesha YameenPakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, Isalambad, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0001-0845-1469
Manjula HettiarachchiFaculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0003-1203-1368
Kunchit JudprasongFood and Nutrition Acedemic and Research Cluster, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9831-693X
Nga Tran ThuyDepartment of Micronutrient Research and Application, National Institute of Nutrition, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0009-4567-343X
Hien Vu Thi ThuDepartment of Micronutrient Research and Application, National Institute of Nutrition, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Munirul IslamNutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8780-8760
Christine SlaterDivision of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0000-6820-0760
Tinku ThomasDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, St. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-6076
Alexia J Murphy-AlfordDivision of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7095-3796

Funding

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) RAS 6073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to assess the agreement in EBF between maternal recall and the dose-to-mother (DTM) technique.

methodsIndonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam participated in the study. A total of 207 and 118 mother-infant pairs were assessed at 3 and 6 months of child's age. Using a standardized questionnaire, mothers were asked to recall child feeding during the previous 24 h, at 3 and 6 months. Those recalled to be EBF proceeded to be assessed using DTM technique. Non-milk oral intake (NMOI) cutoff of 86.6 g/d was used to classify EBF.

resultsAccording to DTM, 66% of infants were EBF at 3 months, while only 22% were EBF at 6 months. At 3 months, the overall % agreement between maternal recall and DTM method was 68%, kappa 0.06 (95% CI: 0.07-0.20), and at 6 months, the % agreement was only 21%, kappa -0.031 (95% CI -0.168 to 0.107). Human milk intakes were similar at 3 months and 6 months when expressed as g/d, but decreased when expressed as g/kg/d, with a large variation within and between countries; Pakistan being the lowest.

conclusionThis study showed there were declining levels of EBF from 3 to 6 months in the participating countries from Asia and the agreement between maternal recall and DTM technique to classify EBF was low. To ensure that the DTM technique can be more widely used in evaluating breastfeeding promotion programs, consensus on the appropriate NMOI cutoff and simplification of the DTM protocol is necessary.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersDeuteriumFemaleHumansInfantMilk, HumanThailandDeuterium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.