Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37838714›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

Coexistence of specialist and generalist species within mixed plastic derivative-utilizing microbial communities.

Laura Schaerer, Lindsay Putman, Isaac Bigcraft, Emma Byrne, Daniel Kulas, Ali Zolghadr, Sulihat Aloba, Rebecca Ong, David Shonnard, Stephen Techtmann

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biofilm mitigation in hybrid chemical-biological upcycling of waste polymers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura SchaererDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 740 Dow ESE Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Lindsay PutmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 740 Dow ESE Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Isaac BigcraftDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 740 Dow ESE Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Emma ByrneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 740 Dow ESE Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Daniel KulasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Ali ZolghadrDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Sulihat AlobaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Rebecca OngDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
David ShonnardDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Stephen TechtmannDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 740 Dow ESE Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. smtechtm@mtu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlastic-degrading microbial isolates offer great potential to degrade, transform, and upcycle plastic waste. Tandem chemical and biological processing of plastic wastes has been shown to substantially increase the rates of plastic degradation; however, the focus of this work has been almost entirely on microbial isolates (either bioengineered or naturally occurring). We propose that a microbial community has even greater potential for plastic upcycling. A microbial community has greater metabolic diversity to process mixed plastic waste streams and has built-in functional redundancy for optimal resilience.

resultsHere, we used two plastic-derivative degrading communities as a model system to investigate the roles of specialist and generalist species within the microbial communities. These communities were grown on five plastic-derived substrates: pyrolysis treated high-density polyethylene, chemically deconstructed polyethylene terephthalate, disodium terephthalate, terephthalamide, and ethylene glycol. Short-read metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing were performed to evaluate activity of microorganisms in each treatment. Long-read metagenomic sequencing was performed to obtain high-quality metagenome assembled genomes and evaluate division of labor.

conclusionsData presented here show that the communities are primarily dominated by Rhodococcus generalists and lower abundance specialists for each of the plastic-derived substrates investigated here, supporting previous research that generalist species dominate batch culture. Additionally, division of labor may be present between Hydrogenophaga terephthalate degrading specialists and lower abundance protocatechuate degrading specialists. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhthalic AcidsMetagenomePolyethylenePhthalic AcidsPolyethyleneterephthalic acidBiodegradationBiotechnologyEcological interactionsGeneralistMicrobial communityPlastic upcyclingPolyethylene terephthalateSpecialistUpcycling

Identifiers

PMID37838714
PMCPMC10576394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.