Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37838614›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2023

Consciousness in the cradle: on the emergence of infant experience.

Tim Bayne, Joel Frohlich, Rhodri Cusack, Julia Moser, Lorina Naci

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can We Talk About Fetal Consciousness?Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026
    Review
  2. Fetal Pain Perception:Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. A survey of views about infant consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026
    Article
  5. Phenomenal consciousness: its scope and limits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Towards a neuroethological approach to consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mental causation: an evolutionary perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Editorial: Fetal analgesia: a conundrum for the physiologist, a tenet for the surgeon.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Tim BayneMonash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Brain, Mind, and Consciousness Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: timothy.bayne@monash.edu.
Joel FrohlichInstitute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Advanced Consciousness Studies, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Rhodri CusackThomas Mitchell Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Julia MoserMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lorina NaciTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IECanadian Institute for Advanced Research · CAHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although each of us was once a baby, infant consciousness remains mysterious and there is no received view about when, and in what form, consciousness first emerges. Some theorists defend a 'late-onset' view, suggesting that consciousness requires cognitive capacities which are unlikely to be in place before the child's first birthday at the very earliest. Other theorists defend an 'early-onset' account, suggesting that consciousness is likely to be in place at birth (or shortly after) and may even arise during the third trimester. Progress in this field has been difficult, not just because of the challenges associated with procuring the relevant behavioral and neural data, but also because of uncertainty about how best to study consciousness in the absence of the capacity for verbal report or intentional behavior. This review examines both the empirical and methodological progress in this field, arguing that recent research points in favor of early-onset accounts of the emergence of consciousness.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornUncertaintyawarenessconsciousnessdevelopmentfetusinfantneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID37838614
PMCPMC10660191
OpenAlexW4387595395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.