Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37837656›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2024

Comparison of Rapid-, Kaolin-, and Native-TEG Parameters in Burn Patient Cohorts With Acute Burn-induced Coagulopathy and Abnormal Fibrinolytic Function.

John W Keyloun, Tuan D Le, Lauren T Moffatt, Thomas Orfeo, Melissa M McLawhorn, Maria-Cristina Bravo, Shawn Tejiram, SYSCOT Study Group, Jeffrey W Shupp, Anthony E Pusateri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

John W KeylounThe Burn Center, Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-2664
Tuan D LeResearch Directorate, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1539-6346
Lauren T MoffattFirefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Thomas OrfeoDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Colchester, VT 05405, USA.
Melissa M McLawhornFirefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-2509
Maria-Cristina BravoDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Colchester, VT 05405, USA.
Shawn TejiramThe Burn Center, Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
SYSCOT Study Group
Jeffrey W ShuppThe Burn Center, Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Anthony E PusateriCombat Casualty Care and Operational Medicine Directorate, Naval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-4835
MedStar Washington Hospital Center · USUnited States Naval Medical Research Unit SOUTH · PEUniversity of Vermont · USGeorgetown University · USMedStar Health · USNaval Medical Research Command · USThe University of Texas at Tyler · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

Defense Health Program W911NF-10-1-03761Systems Biology Coagulopathy of TraumaU.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although use of thromboelastography (TEG) to diagnose coagulopathy and guide clinical decision-making is increasing, relative performance of different TEG methods has not been well-defined. Rapid-TEG (rTEG), kaolin-TEG (kTEG), and native-TEG (nTEG) were performed on blood samples from burn patients presenting to a regional center from admission to 21 days. Patients were categorized by burn severity, mortality, and fibrinolytic phenotypes (Shutdown [SD], Physiologic [PHYS], and Hyperfibrinolytic [HF]). Manufacturer ranges and published TEG cutoffs were examined. Concordance correlations (Rc) of TEG parameters (R, α-angle, maximum amplitude [MA], LY30) measured agreement and Cohen's Kappa (κ) determined interclass reliability. Patients (n = 121) were mostly male (n = 84; 69.4%), with median age 40 years, median TBSA burn 13%, and mortality 17% (n = 21). Severe burns (≥40% TBSA) were associated with lower admission α-angle for rTEG (P = .03) and lower MA for rTEG (P = .02) and kTEG (P = .01). MA was lower in patients who died (nTEG, P = .04; kTEG, P = .02; rTEG, P = .003). Admission HF was associated with increased mortality (OR, 10.45; 95% CI, 2.54-43.31, P = .001) on rTEG only. Delayed SD was associated with mortality using rTEG and nTEG (OR 9.46; 95% CI, 1.96-45.73; P = .005 and OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.35-35.48; P = .02). Admission TEGs showed poor agreement on R-time (Rc, 0.00-0.56) and α-angle (0.40 to 0.55), and moderate agreement on MA (0.67-0.81) and LY30 (0.72-0.93). Interclass reliability was lowest for R-time (κ, -0.07 to 0.01) and α-angle (-0.06 to 0.17) and highest for MA (0.22-0.51) and LY30 (0.29-0.49). Choice of TEG method may impact clinical decision-making. rTEG appeared most sensitive in parameter-specific associations with injury severity, abnormal fibrinolysis, and mortality.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersBurnsAdultFemaleHumansKaolinMaleReproducibility of ResultsThrombelastographyKaolinactivated clotting time (ACT)burnscoagulopathyfibrinolysisTEGthromboelastography

Identifiers

PMID37837656
PMCPMC10768763
OpenAlexW4387649860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.