Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37837504›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2023

Benefits and concerns of expanded carrier screening: what do pregnant Latina women in Texas think?

Embedzayi Madhiri, Haocen Wang, Melodie Tedross, Victoria Vidal, Christine Young, Denise Martinez, Wei-Ju Chen, Patricia Robbins-Furman, Robin Page, Nora Montalvo-Liendo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Embedzayi MadhiriDeparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Haocen WangSchool of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Melodie TedrossDeparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Victoria VidalDeparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Christine YoungDepartment of Hospital Administration, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Denise MartinezDeparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Wei-Ju ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas Permian Basin, Odessa, TX, USA.
Patricia Robbins-FurmanDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robin PageSchool of Nursing, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Nora Montalvo-LiendoSchool of Nursing, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Lei-Shih ChenDeparment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. lacechen@tamu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5320-6350
Texas A&M University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USThe University of Texas of the Permian Basin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends carrier screening for all pregnant women regardless of race or ethnicity. In recent years, the ACMG broadened the guidelines to include expanded carrier screening (ECS) which can screen for 112 conditions. This study seeks to explore the perceptions of pregnant Latina women about the benefits and concerns related to ECS use. Partnering with prenatal clinics in Texas, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 32 pregnant Latina women in their second or third trimester of pregnancy. NVivo 8 was used to conduct content analysis and emergent coding of the data. Participants reported the benefits of ECS as helping them prepare for the baby's arrival, informing them of the baby's risk for genetic conditions, ensuring the health of their baby, and preventing diseases before birth. The ECS-related concerns expressed by the participants included worries surrounding potential positive ECS results, insufficient knowledge about the genetic diseases screened for by ECS, the accuracy of the ECS, the potential harm ECS may cause the baby, and the affordability of ECS. After weighing both their perceived benefits and concerns, nearly all the participants believed that ECS should be offered to all pregnant women. This study contributes to an understudied research area in the genetic/genomic field. Our findings can help increase the awareness of obstetricians, genetic professionals, and other healthcare providers regarding pregnant Latina women's views on ECS and inform the design of culturally appropriate care as ECS is adopted into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

AttitudesExpanded carrier screeningGenetic screeningLatinaPregnancyPrenatal genetic screeningQualitative

Identifiers

PMID37837504
PMCPMC10725381
OpenAlexW4387640354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.