Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37837162›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

HOMLC-Hyperparameter Optimization for Multi-Label Classification of Intrusion Detection Data for Internet of Things Network.

Ankita Sharma, Shalli Rani, Dipak Kumar Sah, Zahid Khan, Wadii Boulila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankita SharmaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India.
Shalli RaniChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-9435
Dipak Kumar SahDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, GLA University, Mathura 281406, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Zahid KhanRobotics and Internet-of-Things Laboratory, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia.
Wadii BoulilaRobotics and Internet-of-Things Laboratory, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-0757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of low-rank-based learning models for multi-label categorization of attacks for intrusion detection datasets is presented in this work. In particular, we investigate the performance of three low-rank-based machine learning (LR-SVM) and deep learning models (LR-CNN), (LR-CNN-MLP) for classifying intrusion detection data: Low Rank Representation (LRR) and Non-negative Low Rank Representation (NLR). We also look into how these models' performance is affected by hyperparameter tweaking by using Guassian Bayes Optimization. The tests has been run on merging two intrusion detection datasets that are available to the public such as BoT-IoT and UNSW- NB15 and assess the models' performance in terms of key evaluation criteria, including precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. Nevertheless, all three models perform noticeably better after hyperparameter modification. The selection of low-rank-based learning models and the significance of the hyperparameter tuning log for multi-label classification of intrusion detection data have been discussed in this work. A hybrid security dataset is used with low rank factorization in addition to SVM, CNN and CNN-MLP. The desired multilabel results have been obtained by considering binary and multi-class attack classification as well. Low rank CNN-MLP achieved suitable results in multilabel classification of attacks. Also, a Gaussian-based Bayesian optimization algorithm is used with CNN-MLP for hyperparametric tuning and the desired results have been achieved using c and γ for SVM and α and β for CNN and CNN-MLP on a hybrid dataset. The results show the label UDP is shared among analysis, DoS and shellcode. The accuracy of classifying UDP among three classes is 98.54%.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningIoTlow-rank representationmultilayer perceptronsecuritysupport vector machinestraffic data

Identifiers

PMID37837162
PMCPMC10575459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.