ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Enhancing Wearable Gait Monitoring Systems: Identifying Optimal Kinematic Inputs in Typical Adolescents.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic Systems for Monitoring Pediatric Gait Biomechanical Parameters: A Systematic Review of Embedded Technologies and Human-Machine Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- IMU-based gait analysis methods: a systematic review of techniques for different body locations.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning-based gait systems facilitate the real-time control of gait assistive technologies in neurological conditions. Improving such systems needs the identification of kinematic signals from inertial measurement unit wearables (IMUs) that are robust across different walking conditions without extensive data processing. We quantify changes in two kinematic signals, acceleration and angular velocity, from IMUs worn on the frontal plane of bilateral shanks and thighs in 30 adolescents (8-18 years) on a treadmills and outdoor overground walking at three different speeds (self-selected, slow, and fast). Primary curve-based analyses included similarity analyses such as cosine, Euclidean distance, Poincare analysis, and a newly defined bilateral symmetry dissimilarity test (BSDT). Analysis indicated that superior-inferior shank acceleration (SI shank Acc) and medial-lateral shank angular velocity (ML shank AV) demonstrated no differences to the control signal in BSDT, indicating the least variability across the different walking conditions. Both SI shank Acc and ML shank AV were also robust in Poincare analysis. Secondary parameter-based similarity analyses with conventional spatiotemporal gait parameters were also performed. This normative dataset of walking reports raw signal kinematics that demonstrate the least to most variability in switching between treadmill and outdoor walking to help guide future machine learning models to assist gait in pediatric neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.