Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836950›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Effect of Using a Rehabilitation Robot for Patients with Post-Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Fatigue Syndrome.

Tomasz Trzmiel, Renata Marchewka, Anna Pieczyńska, Ewa Zasadzka, Igor Zubrycki, Dominika Kozak, Michał Mikulski, Anna Poświata, Sławomir Tobis, Katarzyna Hojan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz TrzmielDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-3494
Renata MarchewkaNeurorehabilitation Ward, Greater Poland Provincial Hospital, 60-480 Poznan, Poland.
Anna PieczyńskaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-7118
Ewa ZasadzkaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-8202
Igor ZubryckiInstitute of Automatic Control, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-2173
Dominika KozakEgzotech sp. z o.o., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Michał MikulskiEgzotech sp. z o.o., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Anna PoświataEgzotech sp. z o.o., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8989-3903
Sławomir TobisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-3258
Katarzyna HojanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLLodz University of Technology · PL

Funding

National Center for Research and Development of Poland POIR.01.01.01-00-2077/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of traditional neurological rehabilitation and neurological rehabilitation combined with a rehabilitation robot for patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. Eighty-six participants transferred from intensive care units due to post-viral fatigue after COVID-19 were randomly divided into two groups: the intervention group and the control group. The control group received standard neurological rehabilitation for 120 min a day, while the intervention group received the same neurological rehabilitation for 75 min a day, complemented by 45 min of exercises on the rehabilitation robot. The Berg scale, Tinetti scale, six-minute walking test, isokinetic muscle force test, hand grip strength, Barthel Index, and Functional Independence Measure were used to measure the outcomes. Both groups improved similarly during the rehabilitation. Between groups, a comparison of before/after changes revealed that the intervention group improved better in terms of Functional Independence Measure (

Indexed as

COVID-19RoboticsExercise TherapyFatigueHand StrengthHumansexerciseshand grip strengthoccupational therapyphysiotherapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37836950
PMCPMC10575211
OpenAlexW4387133474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.