Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836869›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Deep Learning Model for Correlation Analysis between Electroencephalography Signal and Speech Stimuli.

Michele Alessandrini, Laura Falaschetti, Giorgio Biagetti, Paolo Crippa, Simona Luzzi, Claudio Turchetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele AlessandriniDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-7806
Laura FalaschettiDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3183-7682
Giorgio BiagettiDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-0039
Paolo CrippaDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4504-7550
Simona LuzziNeurology Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Torrette, I-60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3802-2320
Claudio TurchettiDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-9790

Funding

European Union - Next Generation EU ECS00000041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the use of electroencephalography (EEG) has grown as a tool for diagnostic and brain function monitoring, being a simple and non-invasive method compared with other procedures like histological sampling. Typically, in order to extract functional brain responses from EEG signals, prolonged and repeated stimuli are needed because of the artifacts generated in recordings which adversely impact the stimulus-response analysis. To mitigate the artifact effect, correlation analysis (CA) methods are applied in the literature, where the predominant approaches focus on enhancing stimulus-response correlations through the use of linear analysis methods like canonical correlation analysis (CCA). This paper introduces a novel CA framework based on a neural network with a loss function specifically designed to maximize correlation between EEG and speech stimuli. Compared with other deep learning CA approaches (DCCAs) in the literature, this framework introduces a single multilayer perceptron (MLP) network instead of two networks for each stimulus. To validate the proposed approach, a comparison with linear CCA (LCCA) and DCCA was performed, using a dataset containing the EEG traces of subjects listening to speech stimuli. The experimental results show that the proposed method improves the overall Pearson correlation by 10.56% compared with the state-of-the-art DCCA method.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSpeechAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansNeural Networks, Computercanonical correlation analysis (CCA)deep correlation analysis (DCCA)deep learningelectroencephalography (EEG)multilayer perceptron (MLP)speech–EEG analysis

Identifiers

PMID37836869
PMCPMC10575037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.