Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836850›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Land and Seabed Surface Modelling in the Coastal Zone Using UAV/USV-Based Data Integration.

Oktawia Specht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Oktawia SpechtDepartment of Transport and Logistics, Gdynia Maritime University, Morska 81-87, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland.

Funding

Gdynia Maritime University WN/PI/2023/03National Centre for Research and Development in Poland LIDER/10/0030/L-11/19/NCBR/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coastal zone is an area that includes the sea coast and adjacent parts of the land and sea, where the mutual interaction of these environments is clearly marked. Hence, the modelling of the land and seabed parts of the coastal zone is crucial and necessary in order to determine the dynamic changes taking place in this area. The accurate determination of the terrain in the coastal zone is now possible thanks to the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs). The aim of this article is to present land and seabed surface modelling in the coastal zone using UAV/USV-based data integration. Bathymetric and photogrammetric measurements were carried out on the waterbody adjacent to a public beach in Gdynia (Poland) in 2022 using the DJI Phantom 4 Real Time Kinematic (RTK) UAV and the AutoDron USV. As a result of geospatial data integration, topo-bathymetric models in the coastal zone were developed using the following terrain-modelling methods: Inverse Distance to a Power (IDP), kriging, Modified Shepard's Method (MSM) and Natural Neighbour Interpolation (NNI). Then, the accuracies of the selected models obtained using the different interpolation methods, taking into account the division into land and seabed parts, were analysed. Research has shown that the most accurate method for modelling both the land and seabed surfaces of the coastal zone is the kriging (linear model) method. The differences between the interpolated and measurement values of the R95 measurement are 0.032 m for the land part and 0.034 m for the seabed part. It should also be noted that the data interpolated by the kriging (linear model) method showed a very good fit to the measurement data recorded by the UAVs and USVs.

Indexed as

coastal zonegeospatial dataland surfaceseabed surfaceterrain modellingUnmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV)

Identifiers

PMID37836850
PMCPMC10574886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.