Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836565›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Comparison of Effectiveness regarding a Culinary Medicine Elective for Medical Students in Germany Delivered Virtually versus In-Person.

Selina Böttcher, Louisa Josefa Schonebeck, Laura Drösch, Anna Manuela Plogmann, Can Gero Leineweber, Seraphina Puderbach, Charlotte Buhre, Christoph Schmöcker, Uwe Neumann, Thomas Ellrott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Adaptation and Validation of the S-NutLit Scale to Assess Nutritional Literacy in the Peruvian Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Selina BöttcherMedical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Diabetes, ukrb, Brandenburg Medical School, Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Louisa Josefa SchonebeckInstitute for Nutrition and Psychology, Georg-August-University Göttingen Medical Centre, Humboldtallee 32, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Laura DröschDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology, and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Anna Manuela PlogmannMedical Centre, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390 Gießen, Germany.
Can Gero LeineweberMedical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Diabetes, ukrb, Brandenburg Medical School, Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Seraphina PuderbachMedical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Diabetes, ukrb, Brandenburg Medical School, Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Charlotte BuhreMedical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Diabetes, ukrb, Brandenburg Medical School, Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6582-9763
Christoph SchmöckerMedical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Diabetes, ukrb, Brandenburg Medical School, Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Uwe NeumannCulinary Medicine Germany e.V., 48341 Altenberge, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-5077-4213
Thomas EllrottInstitute for Nutrition and Psychology, Georg-August-University Göttingen Medical Centre, Humboldtallee 32, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DECulinary Medicine Deutschland e.V.Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

Rut- und Klaus-Bahlsen-Stiftung 515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The Culinary Medicine elective at the German medical schools of the universities of Göttingen, Giessen, and Brandenburg is a teaching kitchen-based elective aimed at training medical students on how to improve patient counselling on nutrition and lifestyle medicine topics. This curriculum was either delivered virtually (2021) or in-person (2022/2023). Changes in teaching effectiveness were evaluated. (2) Methods: The elective included seven modules in the teaching kitchen for 3 h each. It consisted of a short introduction and a hands-on interactive cooking part illustrating important dietary principles in different disease groups. The elective was conducted virtually in 2021 in a fully interactive setup using videoconference tools. Students in this cohort attended from their private kitchens whereas students in the in-person cohort (2022/2023) attended the same classes in the teaching kitchen. Standardized comparative self-assessment questionnaires on counselling competencies, nutrition knowledge, eating habits, and mental well-being (WHO-5) before and after the elective were used to determine teaching effectiveness. Paired and unpaired

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCookingCurriculumDietFeeding BehaviorHumansbehaviour changecounselling competenciesculinary medicinediet-related diseaseshands-on cooking instructionsinterprofessional educationnutrition education for health professionalsnutrition knowledgepatient careteaching kitchen

Identifiers

PMID37836565
PMCPMC10574049
OpenAlexW4387435540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.