Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836553›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Sentiment Analysis of Tweets on Menu Labeling Regulations in the US.

Yuyi Yang, Nan Lin, Quinlan Batcheller, Qianzi Zhou, Jami Anderson, Ruopeng An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuyi YangDivision of Computational and Data Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7625-810X
Nan LinDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-2455
Quinlan BatchellerBrown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-7983
Qianzi ZhouDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Jami AndersonImplementation Science Center for Cancer Control, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Ruopeng AnBrown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menu labeling regulations in the United States mandate chain restaurants to display calorie information for standard menu items, intending to facilitate healthy dietary choices and address obesity concerns. For this study, we utilized machine learning techniques to conduct a novel sentiment analysis of public opinions regarding menu labeling regulations, drawing on Twitter data from 2008 to 2022. Tweets were collected through a systematic search strategy and annotated as positive, negative, neutral, or news. Our temporal analysis revealed that tweeting peaked around major policy announcements, with a majority categorized as neutral or news-related. The prevalence of news tweets declined after 2017, as neutral views became more common over time. Deep neural network models like RoBERTa achieved strong performance (92% accuracy) in classifying sentiments. Key predictors of tweet sentiments identified by the random forest model included the author's followers and tweeting activity. Despite limitations such as Twitter's demographic biases, our analysis provides unique insights into the evolution of perceptions on the regulations since their inception, including the recent rise in negative sentiment. It underscores social media's utility for continuously monitoring public attitudes to inform health policy development, execution, and refinement.

Indexed as

Sentiment AnalysisSocial MediaHumansMachine LearningPublic OpinionUnited Statescalorie countsdeep learningmenu labelingobesitypublic health policysentiment analysisTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37836553
PMCPMC10574510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.