Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836534›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2023

Vitamin D and Child Neurodevelopment-A Post Hoc Analysis.

Megan D Rodgers, Molly J Mead, Caroline A McWhorter, Myla D Ebeling, Judy R Shary, Danforth A Newton, John E Baatz, Mathew J Gregoski, Bruce W Hollis, Carol L Wagner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Vitamin D and Brain Health.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A head start: The relationship of placental factors to craniofacial and brain development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Megan D RodgersCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Molly J MeadCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Caroline A McWhorterCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Myla D EbelingDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Judy R SharyDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Danforth A NewtonDarby Children's Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
John E BaatzDarby Children's Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5870-1000
Mathew J GregoskiDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6939-5771
Bruce W HollisDarby Children's Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Carol L WagnerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-6533

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVitamin D (VitD) has been shown to impact neurodevelopment. Studies have shown that higher 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations (the indicator of vitD status) may be associated with better neurodevelopmental outcomes, although current data are conflicting. This study examined the relationship between total circulating 25(OH)D concentrations and neurodevelopmental outcomes in 3-5-year-old (3-5 yo) children.

methodsIn this study, pregnant women were randomized to receive 400 (standard dose), 2000, or 4000 IU vitD

resultsHigher 25(OH)D at the time of testing was associated with better overall performance on neurodevelopmental testing as measured by the Brigance quotient (B = 0.208,

conclusionThese results suggest that higher 25(OH)D concentrations early in life and higher doses of maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy may have a positive association with neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study also suggests that the VDBP genotype is associated with neurodevelopment and differentially affects various fields of neurodevelopment.

Indexed as

Vitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyChildChild, PreschoolCholecalciferolDietary SupplementsFemaleGenotypeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyVitamin D-Binding ProteinVitaminsCholecalciferolVitamin DVitamin D-Binding ProteinVitaminscholecalciferollongitudinal follow-upmaternal health outcomesneurodevelopmental assessmentsoffspringpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37836534
PMCPMC10574578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.