Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836440›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Pretreatment Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Predicting Prognosis and Survival in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer Treated with Perioperative FLOT.

Ebru Melekoglu, Ertugrul Bayram, Saban Secmeler, Burak Mete, Berksoy Sahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk Prediction Models for Gastric Cancer: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ebru MelekogluDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana 01250, Turkey.
Ertugrul BayramDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana 01250, Turkey.
Saban SecmelerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bahcelievler Medicalpark Hospital, Altinbas University, Istanbul 34180, Turkey.
Burak MeteDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana 01250, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0780-6176
Berksoy SahinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana 01250, Turkey.
Cukurova University · TRAltınbaş University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adverse effects of chemotherapy are more apparent in elderly patients and lead to worse prognosis and mortality. Identifying immunonutritional risk factors is of great importance in terms of treatment effectiveness, prognosis, and mortality in geriatric oncology. The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is an immunonutritional index based on serum CRP and albumin levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of mGPS in predicting prognosis and survival in elderly patients with gastric cancer receiving perioperative FLOT treatment. We retrospectively enrolled 71 patients aged over 65 years and grouped them according to their pretreatment mGPS score. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis showed overall survival was significantly worse in the mGPS 1 and mGPS 2 groups than in the mGPS 0 group (

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAgedC-Reactive ProteinHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminC-Reactive ProteinSerum AlbuminelderlyFLOTgastric cancermodified Glasgow prognostic scoreneoadjuvant chemotherapyprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID37836440
PMCPMC10574228
OpenAlexW4387105437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.