Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836120›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Plant Stomata: An Unrealized Possibility in Plant Defense against Invading Pathogens and Stress Tolerance.

Sandipan Meddya, Shweta Meshram, Deepranjan Sarkar, Rakesh S, Rahul Datta, Sachidanand Singh, Gosangi Avinash, Arun Kumar Kondeti, Ajit Kumar Savani, Thiyagarajan Thulasinathan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Genomic Insights intoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandipan MeddyaSchool of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India.
Shweta MeshramSchool of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India.
Deepranjan SarkarDepartment of Agriculture, Integral Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7320-2728
Rakesh SDepartment of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar 736165, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1966-2824
Rahul DattaDepartment of Geology and Pedology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-2555
Sachidanand SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Smt. S. S. Patel Nootan Science and Commerce College, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar 384315, India.
Gosangi AvinashDepartment of Biochemistry, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141027, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-2928
Arun Kumar KondetiDepartment of Agronomy, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal 518502, India.
Ajit Kumar SavaniDepartment of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat 785013, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-4782
Thiyagarajan ThulasinathanDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, India.
Lovely Professional University · INAcharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University · INAssam Agricultural University · INCharotar University of Science and Technology · INIntegral University · INMendel University in Brno · CZNorth Bengal Agricultural University · INPunjab Agricultural University · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomata are crucial structures in plants that play a primary role in the infection process during a pathogen's attack, as they act as points of access for invading pathogens to enter host tissues. Recent evidence has revealed that stomata are integral to the plant defense system and can actively impede invading pathogens by triggering plant defense responses. Stomata interact with diverse pathogen virulence factors, granting them the capacity to influence plant susceptibility and resistance. Moreover, recent studies focusing on the environmental and microbial regulation of stomatal closure and opening have shed light on the epidemiology of bacterial diseases in plants. Bacteria and fungi can induce stomatal closure using pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), effectively preventing entry through these openings and positioning stomata as a critical component of the plant's innate immune system; however, despite this defense mechanism, some microorganisms have evolved strategies to overcome stomatal protection. Interestingly, recent research supports the hypothesis that stomatal closure caused by PAMPs may function as a more robust barrier against pathogen infection than previously believed. On the other hand, plant stomatal closure is also regulated by factors such as abscisic acid and Ca

Indexed as

abscisic acidbiotic and abiotic stressescytosolic Ca2+defense mechanismssignaling componentsstomatal responses

Identifiers

PMID37836120
PMCPMC10574665
OpenAlexW4387059300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.