Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836083›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

A Review on Polymers for Biomedical Applications on Hard and Soft Tissues and Prosthetic Limbs.

Heitor Luiz Ornaghi, Francisco Maciel Monticeli, Lucas Dall Agnol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Future Frontiers in Bioinspired Implanted Biomaterials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heitor Luiz OrnaghiMantova Indústria de Tubos Plásticos Ltd.a., R. Isidoro Fadanelli, 194-Centenário, Caxias do Sul 95045-137, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-9534
Francisco Maciel MonticeliDepartment of Aerospace Structures and Materials, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-8160
Lucas Dall AgnolPostgraduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering (PGMAT), University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6024-9375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, there has been a significant increase in the use of polymers for biomedical applications. The global medical polymer market size was valued at USD 19.92 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.0% from 2023 to 2030 despite some limitations, such as cost (financial limitation), strength compared to metal plates for bone fracture, design optimization and incorporation of reinforcement. Recently, this increase has been more pronounced due to important advances in synthesis and modification techniques for the design of novel biomaterials and their behavior in vitro and in vivo. Also, modern medicine allows the use of less invasive surgeries and faster surgical sutures. Besides their use in the human body, polymer biomedical materials must have desired physical, chemical, biological, biomechanical, and degradation properties. This review summarizes the use of polymers for biomedical applications, mainly focusing on hard and soft tissues, prosthetic limbs, dental applications, and bone fracture repair. The main properties, gaps, and trends are discussed.

Indexed as

biomedicalbone fracture repairdental applicationspolymersprosthetic limbssoft and hard tissue

Identifiers

PMID37836083
PMCPMC10575019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.