Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37836043›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Bioactive Glasses Enriched with Strontium or Zinc with Different Degrees of Structural Order as Components of Chitosan-Based Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Lidia Ciołek, Małgorzata Krok-Borkowicz, Arkadiusz Gąsiński, Monika Biernat, Agnieszka Antosik, Elżbieta Pamuła

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SrO-Containing Bioactive Glasses in the SiOACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Review
  2. Advances in Functional Scaffolds for Bone and Joint Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Harnessing strontium in regenerative dentistry: progress and perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lidia CiołekBiomaterials Research Group, Łukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Ceramic and Building Materials, 31-983 Kraków, Poland.
Małgorzata Krok-BorkowiczDepartment of Biomaterials and Composites, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.
Arkadiusz GąsińskiCeramics Research Group, Łukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Ceramic and Building Materials, 31-983 Kraków, Poland.
Monika BiernatBiomaterials Research Group, Łukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Ceramic and Building Materials, 31-983 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5692-0653
Agnieszka AntosikCeramics Research Group, Łukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Ceramic and Building Materials, 31-983 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-4285
Elżbieta PamułaDepartment of Biomaterials and Composites, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0464-6189
Łukasiewicz Research Network · PLAGH University of Krakow · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of innovative biomaterials with improved integration with bone tissue and stimulating regeneration processes is necessary. Here, we evaluate the usefulness of bioactive glasses from the SiO

Indexed as

biodegradable compositesbioglasschitosaninternal structure of glass

Identifiers

PMID37836043
PMCPMC10575023
OpenAlexW4387372916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.