Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835896›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Interpretation of Heart and Lungs Sounds Acquired via Remote, Digital Auscultation Reached Fair-to-Substantial Levels of Consensus among Specialist Physicians.

Diana Magor, Evgeny Berkov, Dmitry Siomin, Eli Karniel, Nir Lasman, Liat Radinsky Waldman, Irina Gringauz, Shai Stern, Reut Lerner Kassif, Galia Barkai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diana MagorHIT-Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel.
Evgeny BerkovInternal Medicine Department C, Rabin Medical Center, Sharon Campus, Petah Tikva 494149, Israel.
Dmitry SiominInternal Medicine Department C, Rabin Medical Center, Sharon Campus, Petah Tikva 494149, Israel.
Eli KarnielInternal Medicine Department B, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 4428164, Israel.
Nir LasmanInternal Medicine Department I, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel.
Liat Radinsky WaldmanInternal Medicine Department A, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel.
Irina GringauzGeriatric Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Rehabilitation Hospital, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel.
Shai SternThe Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, Safed 1311502, Israel.
Reut Lerner KassifDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel.
Galia BarkaiBeyond Virtual Hospital, Tele-Medicine Virtual Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel.
Hadas LewyHIT-Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel.
Gad SegalBeyond Virtual Hospital, Tele-Medicine Virtual Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5265601, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-3245
Sheba Medical Center · ILHolon Institute of Technology · ILRabin Medical Center · ILBar-Ilan University · ILMeir Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological advancement may bridge gaps between long-practiced medical competencies and modern technologies. Such a domain is the application of digital stethoscopes used for physical examination in telemedicine. This study aimed to validate the level of consensus among physicians regarding the interpretation of remote, digital auscultation of heart and lung sounds.

methodsSeven specialist physicians considered both the technical quality and clinical interpretation of auscultation findings of pre-recorded heart and lung sounds of patients hospitalized in their homes. TytoCare

resultsIn total, 140 sounds (70 heart and 70 lungs) were presented to seven specialists. The level of agreement was measured using Fleiss' Kappa (FK) variable. Agreement relating to heart sounds reached low-to-moderate consensus: the overall technical quality (FK = 0.199), rhythm regularity (FK = 0.328), presence of murmurs (FK = 0.469), appreciation of sounds as remote (FK = 0.011), and an overall diagnosis as normal or pathologic (FK = 0.304). The interpretation of some of the lung sounds reached a higher consensus: the overall technical quality (FK = 0.169), crepitus (FK = 0.514), wheezing (FK = 0.704), bronchial sounds (FK = 0.034), and an overall diagnosis as normal or pathological (FK = 0.386). Most Fleiss' Kappa values were in the range of "fare consensus", while in the domains of diagnosing lung crepitus and wheezing, the values increased to the "substantial" level.

conclusionsBio signals, as recorded auscultations of the heart and lung sounds serving the process of clinical assessment of remotely situated patients, do not achieve a high enough level of agreement between specialized physicians. These findings should serve as a catalyzer for improving the process of telemedicine-attained bio-signals and their clinical interpretation.

Indexed as

digital auscultationhospital at homeKapa coefficientremote auscultationtelemedicineTytoCareTM

Identifiers

PMID37835896
PMCPMC10572382
OpenAlexW4387458644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.