ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Comparative Analysis of Skin Cancer Detection Applications Using Histogram-Based Local Descriptors.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boosting skin cancer diagnosis accuracy with ensemble approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis Through Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Models: A Two-Phase Transfer Learning Approach.International journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the most serious types of cancer is skin cancer. Despite the risk of death, when caught early, the rate of survival is greater than 95%. This inspires researchers to explore methods that allow for the early detection of skin cancer that could save millions of lives. The ability to detect the early signs of skin cancer has become more urgent in light of the rising number of illnesses, the high death rate, and costly healthcare treatments. Given the gravity of these issues, experts have created a number of existing approaches for detecting skin cancer. Identifying skin cancer and whether it is benign or malignant involves detecting features of the lesions such as size, form, symmetry, color, etc. The aim of this study is to determine the most successful skin cancer detection methods by comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of the various applications that categorize benign and malignant forms of skin cancer. Descriptors such as the Local Binary Pattern (LBP), the Local Directional Number Pattern (LDN), the Pyramid of Histogram of Oriented Gradients (PHOG), the Local Directional Pattern (LDiP), and Monogenic Binary Coding (MBC) are used to extract the necessary features. Support vector machines (SVM) and XGBoost are used in the classification process. In addition, this study uses colored histogram-based features to classify the various characteristics obtained from the color images. In the experimental results, the applications implemented with the proposed color histogram-based features were observed to be more successful. Under the proposed method (the colored LDN feature obtained using the YCbCr color space with the XGBoost classifier), a 90% accuracy rate was achieved on Dataset 1, which was obtained from the Kaggle website. For the HAM10000 data set, an accuracy rate of 96.50% was achieved under a similar proposed method (the colored MBC feature obtained using the HSV color space with the XGBoost classifier).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.