Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835882›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Using Radiomics and Machine Learning Applied to MRI to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Valentina Chiappa, Giorgio Bogani, Matteo Interlenghi, Giulia Vittori Antisari, Christian Salvatore, Lucia Zanchi, Manuela Ludovisi, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Giuseppina Calareso, Edward Haeusler and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uterine Müllerianosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina ChiappaGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BoganiGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8569
Matteo InterlenghiDeepTrace Technologies S.R.L., 20126 Milan, Italy.
Giulia Vittori AntisariAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Verona, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Christian SalvatoreDeepTrace Technologies S.R.L., 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9312-4675
Lucia ZanchiDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Manuela LudovisiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-7213
Umberto Leone Roberti MaggioreGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Giuseppina CalaresoRadiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Edward HaeuslerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Francesco RaspagliesiGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Isabella CastiglioniDepartment of Physics G. Occhialini, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-5417
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery could be a safe alternative to chemo-radiation in cervical cancer patients who are not willing to receive radiotherapy. The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the main factor influencing the need for adjunctive treatments and survival. In the present paper we aim to develop a machine learning model based on cervix magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to stratify the single-subject risk of cervical cancer. We collected MRI images from 72 subjects. Among these subjects, 28 patients (38.9%) belonged to the "Not completely responding" class and 44 patients (61.1%) belonged to the 'Completely responding' class according to their response to treatment. This image set was used for the training and cross-validation of different machine learning models. A robust radiomic approach was applied, under the hypothesis that the radiomic features could be able to capture the disease heterogeneity among the two groups. Three models consisting of three ensembles of machine learning classifiers (random forests, support vector machines, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers) were developed for the binary classification task of interest ("Not completely responding" vs. "Completely responding"), based on supervised learning, using response to treatment as the reference standard. The best model showed an ROC-AUC (%) of 83 (majority vote), 82.3 (mean) [79.9-84.6], an accuracy (%) of 74, 74.1 [72.1-76.1], a sensitivity (%) of 71, 73.8 [68.7-78.9], and a specificity (%) of 75, 74.2 [71-77.5]. In conclusion, our preliminary data support the adoption of a radiomic-based approach to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

cervical cancergynecology oncologyMRIneoadjuvant chemotherapyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID37835882
PMCPMC10572442
OpenAlexW4387407963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.