Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835879›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion Using Tumor-Marker Combinations: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on a Stacking Model.

Jingyuan Wang, Jiangjie Zhou, Hanyu Wu, Yangyu Chen, Baosheng Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingyuan WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0009-0009-8460-770X
Jiangjie ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Hanyu WuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yangyu ChenDepartment of Respiration and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing 100020, China.
Baosheng LiangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3500-0820
Peking University · CNBeijing Chaoyang Emergency Medical Center · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 1204031Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities BMU2021RCZX023National Natural Science Foundation of China 11901013PKU-Baidu Fund 2020BD029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBy incorporating the cost of multiple tumor-marker tests, this work aims to comprehensively evaluate the financial burden of patients and the accuracy of machine learning models in diagnosing malignant pleural effusion (MPE) using tumor-marker combinations.

methodsCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 were collected from pleural effusion (PE) and peripheral blood (PB) of 319 patients with pleural effusion. A stacked ensemble (stacking) model based on five machine learning models was utilized to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers. We evaluated the discriminatory accuracy of various tumor-marker combinations using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different tumor-marker combinations, a comprehensive score (C-score) with a tuning parameter

resultsIn most scenarios, the stacking model outperformed the five individual machine learning models in terms of AUC. Among the eight tumor markers, the CEA in PE (PE.CEA) showed the best AUC of 0.902. Among all tumor-marker combinations, the PE.CA19-9 + PE.CA15-3 + PE.CEA + PB.CEA combination (C9 combination) achieved the highest AUC of 0.946. When

conclusionThe stacking diagnostic model using PE.CEA is a relatively accurate and affordable choice in diagnosing MPE for patients without medical insurance or in a low economic level. The stacking model using the combination PE.CA19-9 + PE.CA15-3 + PE.CEA + PB.CEA is the most accurate diagnostic model and the best choice for patients without an economic burden. From a cost-effectiveness perspective, the stacking diagnostic model with PE.CA19-9 + PE.CA15-3 + PE.CEA combination is particularly recommended, as it gains the best trade-off between the low cost and high effectiveness.

Indexed as

cost-effectiveness analysismalignant pleural effusionstacked ensembletumor marker

Identifiers

PMID37835879
PMCPMC10572148
OpenAlexW4387404426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.