ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Preparing Data for Artificial Intelligence in Pathology with Clinical-Grade Performance.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time for a full digital approach in nephropathology: a systematic review of current artificial intelligence applications and future directions.Journal of nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Current quality challenges in H&E preparation: The critical foundation for increased use of digital pathology and AI emergence.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- A multi-task and explainable swin transformer framework for cross-scale computational pathology in gastrointestinal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Interpretable AI-assisted diagnosis of papillary thyroid cancer cytopathology using graph neural networks and knowledge graphs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Telepsychiatry and Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Review of Emerging Approaches to Accessible Psychiatric Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in pathology: Digital transformation, precision medicine, and beyond.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in cancer pathology: Applications, challenges, and future directions.CytoJournal · 2025Review
- Leveraging foundation and large language models in medical artificial intelligence.Chinese medical journal · 2024Review
- Enhancing Medical Imaging Segmentation with GB-SAM: A Novel Approach to Tissue Segmentation Using Granular Box Prompts.Cancers · 2024Article
- Biodistribution Assessment of a NovelLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Detailed Image Data Quality and Cleaning Practices for Artificial Intelligence Tools for Breast Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Algorithm-assisted diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease - evaluation of robustness and comparative image analysis on data from various labs and slide scanners.Diagnostic pathology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Specialty-Level Overview of Emerging AI Trends.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathology is decisive for disease diagnosis but relies heavily on experienced pathologists. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of artificial intelligence in pathology (AIP) to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, the impressive performance of deep learning-based AIP in laboratory settings often proves challenging to replicate in clinical practice. As the data preparation is important for AIP, the paper has reviewed AIP-related studies in the PubMed database published from January 2017 to February 2022, and 118 studies were included. An in-depth analysis of data preparation methods is conducted, encompassing the acquisition of pathological tissue slides, data cleaning, screening, and subsequent digitization. Expert review, image annotation, dataset division for model training and validation are also discussed. Furthermore, we delve into the reasons behind the challenges in reproducing the high performance of AIP in clinical settings and present effective strategies to enhance AIP's clinical performance. The robustness of AIP depends on a randomized collection of representative disease slides, incorporating rigorous quality control and screening, correction of digital discrepancies, reasonable annotation, and sufficient data volume. Digital pathology is fundamental in clinical-grade AIP, and the techniques of data standardization and weakly supervised learning methods based on whole slide image (WSI) are effective ways to overcome obstacles of performance reproduction. The key to performance reproducibility lies in having representative data, an adequate amount of labeling, and ensuring consistency across multiple centers. Digital pathology for clinical diagnosis, data standardization and the technique of WSI-based weakly supervised learning will hopefully build clinical-grade AIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.