Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835819›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Extended-Wavelength-Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (EW-DRS)-Proof of Concept in Ex Vivo Breast Specimens Using Machine Learning.

Nadia Chaudhry, John Albinsson, Magnus Cinthio, Stefan Kröll, Malin Malmsjö, Lisa Rydén, Rafi Sheikh, Nina Reistad, Sophia Zackrisson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06857669 (Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Optical Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06857669 narecruitingnot on this map

Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Optical Techniques

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2020 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsBenign Breast Tumors, Malignant Breast Tumours, HealthyArmsDiffuse reflectance spectroscopy and Photoacoustic imaging,
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nadia ChaudhryDepartment of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
John AlbinssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3106-937X
Magnus CinthioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-8963
Stefan KröllDepartment of Physics, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Malin MalmsjöDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Lisa RydénDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-3130
Rafi SheikhDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8289-9114
Nina ReistadDepartment of Physics, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7025-5725
Sophia ZackrissonDepartment of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-3882

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 654148 and 871124Governmental funding for clinical research (ALF)Malmö General Hospital Cancer FoundationThe Swedish Cancer Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) to distinguish malignant breast tissue from adjacent healthy tissue, and to evaluate if an extended-wavelength range (450-1550 nm) has an advantage over the standard wavelength range (450-900 nm). Multivariate statistics and machine learning algorithms, either linear discriminant analysis (LDA) or support vector machine (SVM) are used to distinguish the two tissue types in breast specimens (total or partial mastectomy) from 23 female patients with primary breast cancer. EW-DRS has a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 91% as compared to a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 71% using the standard wavelength range. The results suggest that DRS can discriminate between malignant and healthy breast tissue, with improved outcomes using an extended wavelength. It is also possible to construct a simple analytical model to improve the diagnostic performance of the DRS technique.

Indexed as

breast cancerdiffuse reflectance spectroscopyextended-wavelength–diffuse reflectance spectroscopylinear discriminant analysismachine learningsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID37835819
PMCPMC10572577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.