Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835807›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

MSRNet: Multiclass Skin Lesion Recognition Using Additional Residual Block Based Fine-Tuned Deep Models Information Fusion and Best Feature Selection.

Sobia Bibi, Muhammad Attique Khan, Jamal Hussain Shah, Robertas Damaševičius, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Majed Alhaisoni, Anum Masood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sobia BibiDepartment of CS, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan.
Muhammad Attique KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut 1102-2801, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-2123
Jamal Hussain ShahDepartment of CS, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan.
Robertas DamaševičiusCenter of Excellence Forest 4.0, Faculty of Informatics, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-9990-1084
Areej AlasiryCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Mehrez MarzouguiCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-5371
Majed AlhaisoniComputer Sciences Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Anum MasoodDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-8969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading significant causes of illness and chronic disease worldwide. Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, is becoming a severe health problem due to its rising prevalence. The considerable death rate linked with melanoma requires early detection to receive immediate and successful treatment. Lesion detection and classification are more challenging due to many forms of artifacts such as hairs, noise, and irregularity of lesion shape, color, irrelevant features, and textures. In this work, we proposed a deep-learning architecture for classifying multiclass skin cancer and melanoma detection. The proposed architecture consists of four core steps: image preprocessing, feature extraction and fusion, feature selection, and classification. A novel contrast enhancement technique is proposed based on the image luminance information. After that, two pre-trained deep models, DarkNet-53 and DensNet-201, are modified in terms of a residual block at the end and trained through transfer learning. In the learning process, the Genetic algorithm is applied to select hyperparameters. The resultant features are fused using a two-step approach named serial-harmonic mean. This step increases the accuracy of the correct classification, but some irrelevant information is also observed. Therefore, an algorithm is developed to select the best features called marine predator optimization (MPA) controlled Reyni Entropy. The selected features are finally classified using machine learning classifiers for the final classification. Two datasets, ISIC2018 and ISIC2019, have been selected for the experimental process. On these datasets, the obtained maximum accuracy of 85.4% and 98.80%, respectively. To prove the effectiveness of the proposed methods, a detailed comparison is conducted with several recent techniques and shows the proposed framework outperforms.

Indexed as

classificationcontrast enhancementdeep learningfeature selectionfusionmarine predator optimizationskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID37835807
PMCPMC10572512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.