ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Bone Metastases Lesion Segmentation on Breast Cancer Bone Scan Images with Negative Sample Training.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic wavelet transform normalized multi scale dense attention UNet with Binary Horse Herd Optimization for osteosarcoma diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The use of deep learning methods for the automatic detection and quantification of bone metastases in bone scan images holds significant clinical value. A fast and accurate automated system for segmenting bone metastatic lesions can assist clinical physicians in diagnosis. In this study, a small internal dataset comprising 100 breast cancer patients (90 cases of bone metastasis and 10 cases of non-metastasis) and 100 prostate cancer patients (50 cases of bone metastasis and 50 cases of non-metastasis) was used for model training. Initially, all image labels were binary. We used the Otsu thresholding method or negative mining to generate a non-metastasis mask, thereby transforming the image labels into three classes. We adopted the Double U-Net as the baseline model and made modifications to its output activation function. We changed the activation function to SoftMax to accommodate multi-class segmentation. Several methods were used to enhance model performance, including background pre-processing to remove background information, adding negative samples to improve model precision, and using transfer learning to leverage shared features between two datasets, which enhances the model's performance. The performance was investigated via 10-fold cross-validation and computed on a pixel-level scale. The best model we achieved had a precision of 69.96%, a sensitivity of 63.55%, and an F1-score of 66.60%. Compared to the baseline model, this represents an 8.40% improvement in precision, a 0.56% improvement in sensitivity, and a 4.33% improvement in the F1-score. The developed system has the potential to provide pre-diagnostic reports for physicians in final decisions and the calculation of the bone scan index (BSI) with the combination with bone skeleton segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.