Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Elena N KashinskayaPapanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok 152742, Yaroslavl Region, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8097-2333
Pavel G VlasenkoInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Tatyana V KolmogorovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Gelena V IzotovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Anastasiya V ShokurovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Georgy A RomanenkoAltai Branch of «VNIRO» («AltaiNIRO»), Barnaul 656043, Russia.
Grigorii N MarkevichA.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia.
Karl B AndreeInstitut de Recerca i Tecnologìa Agroalimentaries (IRTA), 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6564-0015
Mikhail M SolovyevInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals of Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5373-8509
Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals · RUAll-Russian Research Institute Fisheries and Oceanography · RUInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESKronotsky Reserve · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RU
Funding
Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-34-60028Russian international scientific collaboration program Mega-grant 075-15-2022-1134Russian Science Foundation 19-74-10054
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In the present study, we estimated the levels of infestation of the main fish species that are hosts for two
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Metapopulation Structure of Two Species of Pikeworm ( · full record | OpenQuestion