Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835679›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Efficacy of Edible and Leisure Reinforcers with Domestic Dogs.

Xenabeth A Lazaro, John M Winter, Jonathan K Fernand, David J Cox, Nicole R Dorey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xenabeth A LazaroDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2660-6150
John M WinterDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Jonathan K FernandFlorida Institute of Technology, School of Behavior Analysis, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5502-450X
David J CoxInstitute for Applied Behavioral Science, Endicott College, Beverly, MA 01915, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4376-2104
Nicole R DoreyDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-8582-6155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preference assessments are often used to identify stimuli that function as potential reinforcers for training or intervention purposes. Specifically, various preference assessment formats have been used to identify preferred stimuli for humans, cockroaches, cotton-top tamarins, tortoises, and wolves, to name a few. However, to date, no study has evaluated the differential efficacy between food and leisure stimuli within domestic dogs. The current study aimed to compare the reinforcing value and efficacy between food and leisure stimuli for domestic dogs by comparing rates of behavior when receiving access to either their top-preferred food or leisure items. Overall results suggest (1) domestic dogs prefer food over leisure items, and (2) food is more likely to function as a reinforcer than leisure items for domestic dog's behavior. These results suggest that dog owners and trainers should consider using food reinforcers over leisure items as reinforcers when attempting to train dogs.

Indexed as

animal welfareCanis familiarisdomestic dogedible reinforcerleisure reinforcerpaired-stimulus preference assessmentprogressive ratioreinforcer efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37835679
PMCPMC10571986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.