Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835633›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

A Comparative Study of Dogs and Goats with Limited Human Socialization in the Impossible Task Paradigm.

Alfredo Di Lucrezia, Anna Scandurra, Claudia Pinelli, Nadia Musco, Biagio D'Aniello, Vincenzo Mastellone, Fabio Zicarelli, Maria Elena Pero, Pietro Lombardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfredo Di LucreziaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-2302
Anna ScandurraDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-2948
Claudia PinelliDepartment of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1845-9886
Nadia MuscoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9490-9933
Biagio D'AnielloDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-946X
Vincenzo MastelloneDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Fabio ZicarelliDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-7043-992X
Maria Elena PeroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7262-6350
Pietro LombardiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7876-8800
University of Naples Federico II · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

University of Naples Federico II regular funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to explore how limited human socialization affects the socio-cognitive abilities and interactions with unfamiliar individuals of a selected group of domesticated dogs and goats. These animals were raised and kept under conditions characterized by limited human socialization, and their behavior was assessed using the "impossible task" paradigm. The study found that dogs, with a history of cooperative interactions and human companionship, exhibited more frequent social engagement with human experimenters in the experimental setting than goats, traditionally domesticated for utilitarian purposes. However, differences in interaction duration and latency were not significant, highlighting the complexity of these interactions. The results suggest that domestication history and behavioral ecology play significant roles in shaping animals' willingness to engage with humans. However, this study acknowledges limitations, such as the specific population studied, and calls for further research with larger and more diverse samples to generalize these findings. Understanding the interplay between domestication history, behavioral ecology, and human socialization could provide insights into the complex factors influencing animal-human interactions and cognitive behaviors, with implications for animal welfare and human-animal relationships.

Indexed as

comparativedoggoathuman–animal interactionimpossible taskinterspecific communicationunder socialization

Identifiers

PMID37835633
PMCPMC10571704
OpenAlexW4387106032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.