Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835587›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd) Compared to Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Daratumumab-Naïve Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Aimaz Afrough, Shebli Atrash, Barry Paul, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Nausheen Ahmed, Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Anam Bashir, Omar Alkharabsheh, Hamza Hashmi, Al-Ola Abdallah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 64% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aimaz AfroughHematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapy Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Shebli AtrashUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-7534
Barry PaulUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.
Evguenia OuchveridzeDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.
Nausheen AhmedUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.
Zahra MahmoudjafariUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-2521
Anam BashirHematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapy Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Omar AlkharabshehUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-4233
Hamza HashmiUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-5867
Al-Ola AbdallahUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS 66205, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USCarolinas Healthcare System · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daratumumab-based combinations with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (DPd), or bortezomib/dexamethasone (DVd), have shown activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. However, no direct comparisons of safety or efficacy of the two regimens have been published to date. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the safety and efficacy of DPd and DVd in daratumumab-naïve RRMM patients. We included 140 daratumumab-naïve patients who had received DPd or DVd for RRMM. Overall, the DPd group had a greater number of patients who had high-risk disease characteristics. Although response was deeper in the DPd group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the two groups. The DPd group exhibited a higher incidence of hematologic toxicities, whereas the DVd group had a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy. The study results showed that while DPd may provide a deeper response, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS compared to DVd. For the high proportion of difficult-to-treat patients, duration of treatment may have contributed to these results, indicating that patient and disease characteristics should be considered when selecting salvage treatments.

Indexed as

Daratumumab naïveDPdDVdoutcomeRRMM

Identifiers

PMID37835587
PMCPMC10571914
OpenAlexW4387460394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.