Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835561›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Lenvatinib following Immunotherapy: A Real World Evidence Study.

Mathias E Palmer, Jennifer J Gile, Michael H Storandt, Zhaohui Jin, Tyler J Zemla, Nguyen H Tran, Amit Mahipal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Phase Ib/IIa Study of Fostrox in Combination with Lenvatinib as Second-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathias E PalmerDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Jennifer J GileDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Michael H StorandtDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Zhaohui JinDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7844-5833
Tyler J ZemlaDepartment of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Nguyen H TranDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Amit MahipalDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Working to Eliminate Care Disparities in Liver Cancer in Southeast Asian Americans: Transportation and Other Social Determinants of Health.K23MD017217 · NIMHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Nguyen H Tran · 2022 to 2026
$818k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD017217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is an FDA-approved treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first-line setting. Recent trial data have established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as well as tremelimumab plus durvalumab as preferred first-line treatment options for advanced HCC. The role of lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC remains unclear.

methodsWe conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021 at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida who received immunotherapy followed by lenvatinib. Median overall survival and progression-free survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and responses were determined using RECIST 1.1. Adverse events were determined using CTCAE v 4.0.

resultsWe identified 53 patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy. Forty five (85%) patients had a Child Pugh class A at diagnosis, while 30 (58%) patients were still Child Pugh A at time of lenvatinib initiation. Lenvatinib was administered as a second-line treatment in 85% of the patients. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-6.6), and the median OS from the time of lenvatinib initiation was 12.8 months (95% CI: 6.7-19.5). In patients with Child Pugh class A, the median OS and PFS was 14 and 5.2 months, respectively. Race, gender, and Child Pugh class was associated with OS on multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Our study, using real-world data, suggests that patients benefit from treatment with lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy in advanced HCC. The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown, and these results need to be validated in a clinical trial.

Indexed as

hepatocellular cancerimmunotherapylenvatinib

Identifiers

PMID37835561
PMCPMC10571707
OpenAlexW4387408121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.