Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835558›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Cancer-Related Fatigue in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Longitudinal Findings from the Head and Neck 5000 Prospective Clinical Cohort.

Linda Sharp, Laura-Jayne Watson, Liya Lu, Sam Harding, Katrina Hurley, Steve J Thomas, Joanne M Patterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of individualized nutritional intervention on head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Linda SharpPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9515-1722
Laura-Jayne WatsonSpeech & Language Therapy, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK.
Liya LuPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.
Sam HardingSpeech and Language Therapy Research Unit, Southmead Hospital North Bristol NHS Hospital Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-2094
Katrina HurleyHead & Neck 5000 Study, Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Steve J ThomasHead & Neck 5000 Study, Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
Joanne M PattersonLiverpool Head and Neck Centre, School of Health Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-302X
Newcastle University · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

National Institute of Health and Care Research RP-PG-0707-10034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common side-effect of cancer and its treatments. For head and neck cancer (HNC), CRF may exacerbate the symptom burden and poor quality-of-life. Using data from the Head and Neck 5000 prospective clinical cohort, we investigated clinically important CRF over a year post-diagnosis, assessing temporal trends, CRF by HNC site and treatment received, and subgroups at higher risk of CRF. Recruitment was undertaken in 2011-2014. Socio-demographic and clinical data, and patient-reported CRF (EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue subscale score ≥39 of a possible 100) were collected at baseline (pre-treatment) and 4- and 12- months post-baseline. Mixed-effects logistic multivariable regression was used to investigate time trends, compare cancer sites and treatment groups, and identify associations between clinical, socio-demographic and lifestyle variables and CRF. At baseline, 27.8% of 2847 patients scored in the range for clinically important CRF. This was 44.7% at 4 months and 29.6% at 12 months. In the multivariable model, after adjusting for time-point, the odds of having CRF over 12 months were significantly increased in females and current smokers; those with stage 3/4 disease, comorbidities and multimodal treatment; and those who had depression at baseline. The high prevalence of clinically important CRF indicates the need for additional interventions and supports for affected HNC patients. These findings also identified patient subgroups towards whom such interventions could be targeted.

Indexed as

fatiguehead and neck cancerHN5000larynx canceroral cavity canceroropharynx cancerpsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID37835558
PMCPMC10571913
OpenAlexW4387405505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.