Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835517›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Real-World Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Nivolumab for Melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: Results of PRESERV MEL.

Anne Rogiers, Laurence Willemot, Laura McDonald, Hilde Van Campenhout, Guy Berchem, Celine Jacobs, Nathalie Blockx, Andrée Rorive, Bart Neyns

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immune checkpoint inhibition perturbs neuro-immune homeostasis and impairs cognitive function.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne RogiersDepartement of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, 1020 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3716-2559
Laurence WillemotBristol Myers Squibb, 1420 Braine L'Alleud, Belgium.
Laura McDonaldBristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge UB8 1DH, UK.
Hilde Van CampenhoutBristol Myers Squibb, 1420 Braine L'Alleud, Belgium.
Guy BerchemCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, University of Luxembourg, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-2257
Celine JacobsMedical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5286-3519
Nathalie BlockxZiekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Middelheim, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Andrée RoriveCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Bart NeynsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-5903
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium) · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEBristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) · GBCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEGhent University Hospital · BEZiekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg · BE

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 immuno-oncology therapy, is approved as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. PRESERV MEL (Prospective and REtrospective Study of nivolumab thERapy in adjuVant MELanoma) is a real-world observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant nivolumab in patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma in clinical practice in Belgium and Luxembourg.

methodsPatients were enrolled prospectively and retrospectively during a 2-year period (January 2019-January 2021), and will be followed for 5 years. The results reported here are for the second interim analysis (cutoff date 31 December 2021). The index date was the date of first administration of adjuvant nivolumab. Patients received nivolumab for up to 12 months per label. Outcomes included relapse-free survival (RFS), adverse events (AEs)/treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; assessed in prospectively enrolled patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), and EQ-5D-3L instruments). HRQoL was evaluated at group level (mean change in scores from baseline based on minimally important differences) and individual patient level (percentage of patients with clinically important scores based on threshold of clinical importance). Outcomes were analyzed descriptively.

resultsThe study enrolled 152 patients (125 prospective, 27 retrospective) at 15 hospitals in Belgium and Luxembourg. Minimum potential follow-up at time of analysis was 11.4 months. Median age was 60 years (range 29-85), and 53% of patients were male. At 12 and 18 months, the RFS rates were 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.9-80.9) and 68.4% (95% CI: 60.0-75.5), respectively. Median RFS was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in 14% of patients. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 23% of patients. Deaths occurred in 3% of patients and were not related to treatment. Questionnaire completion rates for HRQoL were high at baseline (90-94%) and at 24 months (78-81%). In the group-level analysis for HRQoL, mean changes in scores from baseline remained stable and did not exceed prespecified thresholds for minimally important differences during and after treatment, except for a clinically meaningful improvement in FACT-M surgery subscale scores. In the individual patient-level analysis for EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue and cognitive impairment increased during treatment (at 9 months) compared with baseline. After treatment cessation (at 18 months), the percentage of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue decreased. However, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for emotional, cognitive, and social impairment increased at 18 months compared with during treatment. Most patients with emotional impairment at 9 and 18 months did not experience disease recurrence (91% and 89%, respectively).

conclusionsThese results confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. Cancer-specific, disease-specific, and generic HRQoL were maintained during and after treatment. The percentage of patients reporting emotional and cognitive impairment increased after treatment cessation, emphasizing the need for further investigation and tailored supportive care in these patients.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmenteffectivenesshealth-related quality of lifemelanomanivolumabreal-worldsafety

Identifiers

PMID37835517
PMCPMC10572061
OpenAlexW4387264976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.