ArticleCancers2023
High-Content and High-Throughput Clonogenic Survival Assay Using Fluorescence Barcoding.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental workflow to evaluate nanoparticles combined with photon and carbon-ion medical irradiations in spheroids.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicles from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulate Proliferation, Migration, and Chemosensitivity in Ovarian Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Winners take it all: turning cell competition into a therapeutic ally.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Article
- Clonal dispersal is associated with tumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.iScience · 2025Article
- Antitumor Effect of Butia odorata Hydroalcoholic Extract on C6 and U87MG Glioma Cell Lines: Impact on Redox Status and Inflammation Signaling.Neurochemical research · 2024Article
- Açaí (Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Clonogenic Survival Assay (CSA) is a fundamental tool employed to assess cell survival and proliferative potential in cancer research. Despite its importance, CSA faces limitations, primarily its time- and labor-intensive nature and its binary output. To overcome these limitations and enhance CSA's utility, several approaches have been developed, focusing on increasing the throughput. However, achieving both high-content and high-throughput analyses simultaneously has remained a challenge. In this paper, we introduce LeGO-CSA, an extension of the classical CSA that employs the imaging of cell nuclei barcoded with fluorescent lentiviral gene ontology markers, enabling both high-content and high-throughput analysis. To validate our approach, we contrasted it with results from a classical assay and conducted a proof-of-concept screen of small-molecule inhibitors targeting various pathways relevant to cancer treatment. Notably, our results indicate that the classical CSA may underestimate clonogenicity and unveil intriguing aspects of clonal cell growth. We demonstrate the potential of LeGO-CSA to offer a robust approach for assessing cell survival and proliferation with enhanced precision and throughput, with promising implications for accelerating drug discovery and contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of cellular behavior in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.