Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37835156›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Relative Risks of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Three Australian Communities Exposed to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Data Linkage Study.

Hsei Di Law, Deborah A Randall, Bruce K Armstrong, Catherine D'este, Nina Lazarevic, Rose Hosking, Kayla S Smurthwaite, Susan M Trevenar, Robyn M Lucas, Archie C A Clements and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hsei Di LawNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1590-0370
Deborah A RandallWomen and Babies Research, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW 2050, Australia.
Bruce K ArmstrongSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Catherine D'esteNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Nina LazarevicNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Rose HoskingNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-1274
Kayla S SmurthwaiteNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Susan M TrevenarNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Robyn M LucasNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-3541
Archie C A ClementsOffice of Vice Chancellor, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
Martyn D KirkNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Rosemary J KordaNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-2171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFirefighting foams containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have caused environmental contamination in several Australian residential areas, including Katherine in the Northern Territory (NT), Oakey in Queensland (Qld), and Williamtown in New South Wales (NSW). We examined whether the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes were higher in mothers living in these exposure areas than in selected comparison areas without known contamination.

methodsWe linked residential addresses in exposure areas to addresses collected in the jurisdictional Perinatal Data Collections of the NT (1986-2017), Qld (2007-2018), and NSW (1994-2018) to select all pregnancies from mothers who gave birth while living in these areas. We also identified one comparison group for each exposure area by selecting pregnancies where the maternal address was in selected comparison areas. We examined 12 binary perinatal outcomes and three growth measurements. For each exposure area, we estimated relative risks (RRs) of adverse outcomes and differences in means of growth measures, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and other potential confounders.

resultsWe included 16,970 pregnancies from the NT, 4654 from Qld, and 7475 from NSW. We observed elevated risks of stillbirth in Oakey (RR = 2.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 5.39) and of postpartum haemorrhage (RR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.33) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (RR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.73) in Williamtown. The risks of other perinatal outcomes were not materially different from those in the relevant comparison areas or were uncertain due to small numbers of events.

conclusionsThere was limited evidence for increased risks of adverse perinatal outcomes in mothers living in areas with PFAS contamination from firefighting foams. We found higher risks of some outcomes in individual areas, but these were not consistent across all areas under study and could have been due to chance, bias, or confounding.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsStillbirthAustraliaFemaleHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPregnancyRiskFluorocarbonsbirth outcomesfirefighting foamsmothersperinatalPFASpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37835156
PMCPMC10572760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.